You probably meant atmosphere. You should correct that typo since some people believe Venus doesn't have a surface at all, and they might assume you're inferring that it doesn't (unless of course its surface was made of dry ice, which it's not).
Your question was would you weigh less if the moon was full but the answer talks about your weight *on* the moon. It's too bad we can't fix questions that are incorrect...
the future looks good for solar power as a sustainable green resource considering we've only been using oil for ~100 years and we're already running out of it
I'm sorry Sam, but this one is not entirely right. It might seem so, if you consider the earth as a point-mass, as is often done for the sake of simplicity, which renders your question a bit moot. Both earth and the baseball considered a point mass, there will be no difference.
However, in reality each particle exerts a gravitational pull on the space station. The center of mass and mass is the same in both scenarios, however the distance from each particle changes. I haven't done the math to check if this is correct, but your question is not as simple as it appears. I suspect that due to squared inverse relation of distance, that resultant force of the baseball will be less than that of Earth.
To clarify that should be "... only on the center of mass and the distance ..." since the baseball would have the same center of mass as the earth (both round) the space station would be AOK.
아스트롤라베(astrolabe): 고대·중세에 사용한 천문·항해용의 천체관측기. 어원은 그리스어 astro(star)와 lab(to take)으로 ＜별을 붙잡는 것＞이 본래의 뜻이다. 2세기 무렵 알렉산드리아의 천문학자 프톨레마이오스의 저서 《천문학대계(Almagest)》에 따르면 그 발명은 BC 150년 무렵 히파르코스에 의해서 된 것이라고 한다. 중세에 가장 많이 사용되었으며 17세기에 이르기까지 계속 쓰였다. 본래 아스트롤라베에는 2가지 목적이 있었다. 그 하나는 수평선으로부터의 태양·달·행성 또는 항성(恒星)까지의 고도(각도)측정용이었고, 또 하나의 목적은 천문계산용 계산기였는데 계산기 쪽에 중점을 두었다.
Technically incorrect. We have discovered exoplanets outside our solar system.